Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
India Newspapers

Surplus budget for Gulbarga corporation

Print PDF

Source : The Hindu Date : 30.06.2009

Surplus budget for Gulbarga corporation

Special Correspondent

GULBARGA: The general body of the Gulbarga City Corporation on Monday gave its unanimous approval to a Rs. 4.34-crore surplus budget for 2009-10.

The budget proposals placed by the Finance and Taxation Committee chairperson, Savitramma Kalyanrao Patil, in the general body meeting here, put the anticipated receipts at Rs. 188.77 crore and the expenditure at Rs. 184.42 crore.

Ms. Patil said that the anticipated receipts from the State Government was Rs. 37.82 crore and the balance would be mobilised locally. The anticipated revenue from property tax was Rs. 20 crore, followed by Rs. 7 crore development charges, Rs. 3 crore water charges and underground drainage connections and Rs. 2 crore from trade licences.

The budget document said that Rs. 14 crore has been earmarked for the construction of roads, pavements and footpaths and Rs. 6.05 crore for street lights in the city.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 30 June 2009 07:37
 

‘Extend deadline for tax payment’

Print PDF

Source : The Hindu Date : 30.06.2009

‘Extend deadline for tax payment’

Special Correspondent

BANGALORE: M. Ramachandrappa and S.T. Somasekhar, spokespersons of the Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee, on Monday demanded that Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Commissioner Bharat Lal Meena extend the deadline for payment of property tax due for 2008-09, up to March 2010.

Addressing presspersons, they urged Mr. Meena not to burden the owners with any penalty, who would pay property tax after June 30, the deadline fixed by the BBMP. It was the State Government and the BBMP, which were guilty of not collecting the tax from the owners in the city and the defaulters should not be penalised with a monthly interest of 2 per cent from July 1, they said. It worked out to 24 per cent, a year, which was more than what the banks charged.

Moreover, under the Karnataka Municipalities Act, the owners could pay property tax during the whole year and it should not be restricted to only two months. They alleged that the Commissioner had been represented a few days ago in this regard, but he had not replied to their memorandum.

The leaders said that more than 35 per cent of the owners, especially the poor and women/widows had not paid the property tax and urged that they should be given sufficient time to pay it. Instead of winning the confidence of the citizens, they alleged that the BBMP was threatening them with siezure and auctioning the properties.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 30 June 2009 07:33
 

JNNURM: Lagadapati’s remarks trigger row

Print PDF

Source : The Hindu Date : 30.06.2009

JNNURM: Lagadapati’s remarks trigger row

Staff Reporter

The Vijayawada MP pleads ignorance of State government’s order on funding

 


Lagadapati attends the VMC meeting after a long time

The subject postponed for next meeting


VIJAYAWADA: Lagadapati Rajagopal, MP, has pleaded ignorance of an order issued by the State government seeking to treat a major part of its share of funding for the projects taken up under the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) as loan.

The MP said this at the general body meeting of the Vijayawada Municipal Corporation (VMC) on Monday, the second day of deliberations after only a few issues on the agenda were discussed on Saturday.

The State government’s decision to treat a major chunk of its contribution for the JNNURM projects as loan was reported in these columns recently.

The MP, who attended the VMC general body meeting after a long time, said during a discussion on the issue: “I came to know recently that the State government issued a GO stating that its contribution as grant would be 2 per cent and the remaining 18 per cent would be treated as loan, instead of the entire 20 per cent as grant as stated earlier.”

Acrimonious debate

The statement led to an acrimonious debate between CPI (M) floor leader Ch. Babu Rao and Mr. Rajagopal.

Refusing to accept the MP’s claim of ignorance of the order, Mr. Babu Rao questioned him: “How do you substantiate your claim when the GO was issued in 2006? Were you not a member of the sanctioning committee?”

Sharply reacting, Mr. Rajagopal said: “I can’t study every GO issued by the State government on day-to-day basis.”

The CPI (M) leader reminded the MP that the guidelines were prepared by the Central government, and the State government religiously followed them.

Mr. Rajagopal reacted bitterly and said that he would not like to enter into an argument.

“I am neither a member of the State level committee nor an MLA. The issue has to be sorted out between the urban local body (VMC) and the State government,” he maintained.

In a bid to ease the situation, Mr. Rajagopal said that in the interests of the city and its people a committee could be formed to take up the issue with Chief Minister Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy.

“We all can request the Chief Minister to exempt the city from footing the huge loan in view of the financial implications it involves,” he said, and left the meeting hall without giving any scope for a further discussion.

Later in the evening, the officials placed before the general body, under section 88K of the HMC Act, the GO and the information pertaining to it.

The ruling Congress and opposition parties decided to postpone the subject for next meeting.

Congress corporators said they would discuss the issue with the officials for taking suitable action and to chalk out a necessary plan.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 30 June 2009 06:58
 


Page 4849 of 4907