Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Urban Planning

New building trend catching up in city

Print PDF

The Hindu           15.03.2011

New building trend catching up in city

G.V.R. Subba Rao

‘Non-availability of land is a major constraint to construction of new apartments'

The trend of old apartment complexes being pulled down to construct new ones is fast spreading in Vijayawada, as seen here at Mogalrajapuram. Photo: Ch. Vijaya Bhaskar
The trend of old apartment complexes being pulled down to construct new ones is fast spreading in Vijayawada, as seen here at Mogalrajapuram. Photo: Ch. Vijaya Bhaskar

A new trend in construction industry is catching up in the city. Faced with scarcity of land to take up new constructions, a few builders have started looking for apartments constructed decades ago so that they could pull the buildings down and construct new apartments.

Builders say that non-availability of land is a major constraint to construction of new apartments. Land prices have over the years skyrocketed in the city and on the outskirts. With the people preferring to live within the city area, builders have started looking for apartments constructed when the culture of living in flats just started in the city. The dwellers of such apartments too are coming forward for re-construction for various reasons, including to gain more plinth area, have better amenities like lift facility and, of course, to get a ‘new home'.

For instance, Bhanu Apartments in Moghalrajapuram is now being demolished for redevelopment. At present, there are only 32 flats in the two blocks of Bhanu Apartments. After redevelopment 60 flats are expected to be ready for occupation, says G. Narayana Rao, the builder who is redeveloping it. “The plinth area of each old apartment was just a little more than 1,100 sq. ft. But now at least 1,200 sq.ft. is ensured for each flat. As many as 30 three-bedroom flats and another 30 two-bed room flats can be constructed in the half-acre land available there. Probably, ours is the first venture of this kind in the city,” he says.

Senior builder Gadde Rajaling compares the trend to reconstruction that took place in London. “Vijayawada is locked between hills and canals and there is hardly any scope to grow horizontally. And, the land rates are so high that a square yard of land has touched Rs. 35,000, though it was just Rs. 15,000 to Rs. 18,000 per sq. yard till a year ago. As an alternative, we are in search of old apartments and we are negotiating with flat owners in two to three areas,” he says.

New rules

But not all builders are early birds. The chances are meagre for new entrants for one reason: the new building rules. Those who took approval of plans before the commencement of new building rules in that came into force in 2007-08 only would be able to take up these kinds of ventures. The new rules stipulate that fire tenders should be able to move around the building. It might not be possible in apartments constructed in smaller areas, explain a few other builders.


  • Land rates hovering around Rs. 35,000 per sq. yard
  • A senior builder compares the trend to the one in London
  •  

    GHMC fails to refund BPS money to rejected applicants

    Print PDF

    The Times of India    14.03.2011

    GHMC fails to refund BPS money to rejected applicants

    HYDERABAD: The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) is in a fix. On one hand, it has rejected 28,000 Building Penalisation Scheme (BPS) applications, while on the other hand it has no money to refund penal amount collected from applicants whose applications were rejected.

    Nearly 28,000 of 2.03 lakh applications were rejected by the civic body as structures came up on government land, municipal land, open spaces, parks, lake beds and play grounds.

    Though ineligible applications were rejected one-and-half years ago and most of them were intimated about it, the GHMC has not yet refunded the penal amount of about Rs 25 crore. Another 34,000 applications are also being treated as rejected as owners paid only a part of the penal amount.

    The corporation is unable to refund money as it has diverted the BPS penal amount for its projects. The BPS had fetched about Rs 678 crore to the GHMC. While the corporation received Rs 298 crore as initial payment for the BPS, it netted another Rs 380 crore during clearance of the applications.

    Incidentally, the corporation had not refunded penal amount to about 5,500 applicants whose applications were rejected during the previous Building Regularisation Scheme ( BRS), a scheme similar to BPS, in 1998.

    As per the municipal administration and urban development (MA&UD) department instructions on BPS, the GHMC was supposed to maintain a special escrow account for BPS penal amount. However, the corporation diverted the entire amount for various schemes as it had been facing financial crisis.

    Officials admit that unless and until the initial amount they received from rejected applicants is refunded, the civic body has no authority to demolish the structures, which means rejected applicants face no demolition threat immediately.

    "As of now, the corporation will not refund the penal amount to the rejected applicants. We have decided to impose additional property tax over their regular tax till the structure is demolished," GHMC chief city planner GV Raghu told TOI.

    The last date for processing the BPS applications had expired on December 31, 2010 and the GHMC cannot regularise any more applications. Nearly, 34,000 owners have to clear their BPS dues to the corporation which might fetch another Rs 100 crore.

    GHMC officials said the maximum number of pending applications were in L B Nagar and Gaddiannaram circle, where 5,141 applicants have to clear their dues followed by Malkajgiri circle where 4,738 applicants have to clear the dues.

    With the deadline over, the GHMC officials have started levying 25 per cent additional property tax.

     

     

    GVMC told to stop construction of high-rise building

    Print PDF

    The Hindu      10.03.2011

    GVMC told to stop construction of high-rise building

    Sumit Bhattacharjee

    Land was allegedly regularised in violation of rules

    Special Officer Urban Land Ceiling has asked the Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation (GVMC) to cut its water supply, revoke its building permission and stop all construction activity at the site being developed into a high-rise apartment complex by Clover Associates near R.K. Beach. The action was initiated after the Principal Secretary (Revenue) had directed the district Collector to launch prosecution proceedings against the persons concerned in the alleged land scam and also asked the local police or CID to conduct an investigation. The alleged scam concerns the regularisation of ULC (urban land ceiling) land measuring 8,329 sq. m., under survey number 1011 in Waltair Ward, near the prime location of R K Beach, in favour of two private parties and a contended ‘fictitious' cooperative society. The alleged irregularities were first exposed by The Hindu in a report dated February 15. The ULC land was regularised in favour of Kasi Naga Kanaka Brahmam, P. Venkatapathi Raju and a society by name Sri Rama Cooperative Building Society by the Revenue Department in Hyderabad vide four GOs 455, 256, 398 and 424, despite the then district Collector A.K. Singhal's written communication to the government, suggesting that the two individual parties were trying to regularise the lands in their favour by furnishing fraud property tax pass books and that the association was a fictitious one. His claim of ‘fraud pass books' was supported by certificates issued by the then GVMC N. Srikant and Mukesh Kumar Meena.

    The land was later sold to Clover Associates by the parties for development.

    GVMC Commissioner V.N. Vishna has also initiated an independent enquiry. He informed The Hindu that if the investigation proved the charges and correlates with the district Collector's and ULC Department's finding, he might exercise the option of revoking Section 450 of the HMC Act of 1955. Convenor of Forum for Better Visakha E.A.S. Sarma has written to the Chief Minister asking him to give permission to start prosecution against the persons directly or indirectly involved in the issue under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act – 1988.


  • Principal Secretary asks Collector to prosecute persons involved in the land scam
  • GVMC Commissioner also initiates independent enquiry into the matter
  •  


    Page 98 of 328