Urban News

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Poverty Alleviation

Summit vision: Cities need alternative development plan

Print PDF

Indian Express 25.09.2009

Summit vision: Cities need alternative development plan

Development

More than 300 students and professionals from across the country turned up for day one of the Urban Habitat Summit, a multilayered initiative jointly hosted by the India Habitat Centre and the Urban Habitats Forum.

Termed as the largest urban development summit and a platform to initiate dialogue on best urban practices, the event saw balanced participation between civil society groups and the government — M Ramachandran, Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Arun Maira, member of Planning Commission and Rakesh Mehta, Delhi Chief Secretary, addressed different discussion groups.

Ramachandran delivered the keynote address in an afternoon session themed “Alternative Urban Features for India,” where he called for greater co-ordination between national, state and local bodies as well as the civil society “to create sustainable and safer cities”.

With rapid infrastructural development taking place across the nation, Ramachandran outlined a broad framework for sustainable urbanisation. He highlighted the fact that the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) has funded 467 projects worth Rs 50,339 crore since its inception nearly four years ago.

According to Ramachandran, it is imperative to make “masterplans that are more dynamic and requirement-centric.” He also focussed on the need to improve sanitation facilities in cities and linking financial assistance to reforms.

Ramachandran also spoke briefly on the various policies initiated by the Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD), such as the National Mission on Sustainable Habitat and the National Urban Sanitation Policy. The MoUD is expecting deliverables from 14 centres of excellence it has helped develop in various institutes across the country, including a few IITs. These centres of excellence will study capacity building for urban development, he added. With over 65 speakers from diverse fields, the three-day summit will address various subjects related to urban planning, such as transport, infrastructure development and water.

Last Updated on Friday, 25 September 2009 11:31
 

Slumdwellers get APL cards instead of Antyodaya benefits

Print PDF

Indian Express 23.09.2009

Slumdwellers get APL cards instead of Antyodaya benefits

Slum dwellers and homeless beggars evacuated from their original settlements and shifted to new areas in Ahmedabad ‘no longer live below poverty line’, if their ration cards and government records are to be believed, which show belonging to the Above Poverty Line (APL) category.

Consider these: Shaligram and Jhumar Tayde are an old homeless beggar couple who live under a tree at Piplag in Ahmedabad, after they were driven out from Khodiyarnagar. But the government gave them an APL ration card.

Fatema Sheikh (85), a vagrant, homeless widow, sleeps beside a tea stall at night and begs in the day. She was shifted from Santoshnagar to Khodiyarnagar and then to Piplag. Despite being entitled for a card under the Antyodaya Ann Yojana (AAY), due to her extremely poor condition, she has an APL card.

They are not alone. Many of the 2,500 to 3,000 people relocated from Khodiyarnagar, Kankaria, Dhor Bazar, Danilimbda, Kalupur, Paldi, Gulbai Tekra, Mangal Talavdi and the Shah Alam slum areas are poorer after their re-settlement, but have been given only APL cards. The rest do not have any card.

Besides, at a time when the state government is moving towards Mobile Ration Cards for poor migrants, the slum dwellers evacuated to suit the city’s growth plans are refused ration at ration stores.

Constant shuffling denies these poor families foodgrains and other items available on ration rates. The Tayde family, for instance, makes around Rs 50 a day from begging and gets only kerosene with their APL card. Shaligram said: “My wife goes begging everyday and in the evening we manage a meal with whatever she earns. Before we were evacuated from Khodiyarnagar, we used to get ration with our BPL card. But now, with this APL card, we get only kerosene. Many a times we survive on leftovers dumped in the nearby areas.”

Many evacuees in Piplag have now left their traditional occupations to engage in manual labour. They earn about Rs 100 a day; have no pucca house, land, or other things which can qualify them for APL; but for the government they fall in the APL category.

Besides, the Antyodaya category meant for the poorest lot — widows, disabled, ones without family and others— are not issued AAY cards easily. Fatema Sheikh, who had applied for an AAY card, has been waiting for one for the last 15 years. She was asked to get a double stamp on the BPL card to come under the AAY category. But after she was shifted to Piplag, she was told she no longer belonged to the BPL category.

The state government records show 7,133 people in the AAY category, 78,722 in the BPL category and 218,811 in the APL category.

Explaining how their cards change, Mazhar Pathan from Gomtipur Chapra said: “We were first evacuated from Gulbai Tekra to Odhav and then to Sorainagar. We were denied ration at stores in Sorainagar and were asked to go to the old PDS store and fill a form for renewing the cards. We got a card six months after filling the form (sogandnamu), but when we went to use it, we were told that we have been shifted to the APL category and are entitled to get only kerosene.”

Many others driven out of their original hutments and shifted to other settlements have the same story to tell.

The situation worsens for evacuees as ration stores in new areas refuse to accept their new APL cards. Manecklal Navkar from Piplag said: “We travel thrice a week to Khodiyarnagar and others go to Danilimda or Behrampura, nearly 20 to 25 kms away, to get day-to-day commodities from ration stores. We are refused ration at stores in the neighborhood areas and are asked to go to PDS stores in our previous settlements. It costs us Rs 300 to 500 every month. Piplag, which is an industrial area, has no ration store anyway.”

Municipal Commissioner I P Gautam said he had no clue about this. “When we shifted them, we also got their ration stores transferred. But if the people are not getting ration from the stores, I will ask the Deputy Municipal Commissioner to look into the matter.”

Hareet Shukla, Collector, Ahmedabad, said he cannot comment on the discrepancies and only the Food and Supplies Department can fix the problem.

According to the Central government regulations, BPL families are entitled to 9 kg wheat, 3.5 kg rice, 1 kg sugar, and 10 litre kerosene.

Baburam Patel, a BPL card holder said, the ration stores give far less than the quantity fixed, and also refuse to give them the bills of purchase.

“Even with the BPL cards, we used to get only 7.5 kg wheat instead of 9 kg, 1 kg rice instead of 3.5 kg and 6 to 7 litre kerosene instead of the quantity allotted to us. When we demanded ration on the quantity fixed by the government we were threatened that we won’t get any.”

Last Updated on Wednesday, 23 September 2009 11:22
 

Most of India's urban poor are in Maharashtra

Print PDF

The Times of India 22.09.2009

Most of India's urban poor are in Maharashtra

MUMBAI: The overblown myth about the `city of gold' where poor migrants make their fortune has been dealt a blow by a recent report from the Union ministry of housing and urban poverty alleviation. Not only has Maharashtra been accorded the dubious distinction of being home to the largest number of urban poor in the country, it is also the biggest receiver of central government funds - almost 17% of the total amount - granted for the urban poor in the country's cities under the Swarna Jayanti Shahari Rozgar Yojana (SJSRY) for the year 2009-2010.

The SJSRY is a unified centrally sponsored scheme launched in lieu of the erstwhile urban poverty alleviation programmes, namely the Nehru Rozgar Yojana (NRY), Prime Minister's Integrated Urban Poverty Eradication Programme (PMIUPEP) and Urban Basic Services for the Poor (UBSP).

This year, the ministry has set aside Rs 485 crore to help 50,000 urban poor to start individual or group micro enterprises for self-employment. It also intends to provide skill training to 200,000 poor individuals. A target of assisting 50,000 urban poor women has also been prescribed.

Maharashtra has received Rs 80 crore for its urban poor population of 1.46 crore - almost twice the amount received by Madhya Pradesh and five times the amount received by Bihar.

Uttar Pradesh ranks second in the maximum number of poor at 1.17 crore and draws Rs 64.62 crore from central government coffers. North-Eastern states, including Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Sikkim, Mizoram and Nagaland, are home to the least number of urban poor and collectively draw not more than Rs 1 crore for their upliftment.

Incidentally, Uttar Pradesh is home to the maximum below-the-poverty-line minority population at 4.70 lakh people, followed by Maharashtra's 3.33 lakh.

Experts say it is not surprising that Maharashtra - under all its glitter and status of a developed state - houses the maximum number of poor. "On the one hand, Maharashtra has claimed the status of a developed state and is ranked second or third in the human development index. But the maximum number of poor only points towards misplaced policies and government schemes. Rather than benefiting the lowest stratum of society, the government ends up downgrading its economic status and there is a huge difference between the claimed status of the state and what is on the ground,'' said Simpreet Singh of the National Alliance of People's Movement.

Organisations that work with slums also look at the fund allocation with scepticism. "Promises of funds are always made. But what amount is actually used? It remains to be seen whether the money will actually get out of treasury and, if yes, how much,'' said Jockin Arputham, Magsaysay Award winner and president of the National Slum Dwellers' Federation (NSDF).
 


Page 17 of 22